Independent prototype. Not a Government of Canada service, not affiliated with it, and not official advice. Always verify anything that matters at the source. How this works

GC Simplified

🏛️ GC Translator

What do they actually mean?

Paste government language, an email, a sentence from a briefing, or an acronym. We’ll help translate it into plain English, or run it the other way, and watch a clear sentence disappear.

Or try one of these

Do not paste classified, protected, personal or otherwise sensitive government information. Translation, analysis and search all run in your browser. Nothing is sent anywhere unless you press an AI button. Those are marked ✨ AI and always ask first.

Bureaucracy score

4/10

Meeting Regular

Fluent in circle-back. Two years in, maybe three.

Where it came from

Buzzwords
2+2.3

2 recognised phrases from the glossary.

Passive voice
0

Someone is doing the doing.

Hedging
0

No escape hatches.

Actual meaning
17%+1.4

17% of the words carry content. The rest is scaffolding.

Counted from the text, not estimated. The same sentence always scores the same. A playful measure of style, not a judgement of anyone who writes this way.

What you gave us

50% of these words are jargon

The position is .

Highlighted phrases are in our glossary. Select one for the definition. The darker the shade, the more bureaucratic the term.

  • Plain
  • Some government-speak
  • Maximum bureaucracy

Plain English

Rules, not AI

The position is bilingual imperative CBC. (CBC = Reading C, Writing B, Oral C) In practice: "imperative staffing" means imperative means you must already meet the language requirements on day one. Non-imperative means you can be appointed and meet them later.; "language profile" means three letters describing the second-language ability a position requires: reading, writing, and speaking, in that order..

Terms in this

Select one for the full explanation.

Confidence

Medium confidence

We recognised 2 glossary terms, but the sentence-level rewrite is rule-based rather than written by a person. Compare it with the original.

Readability

17→32

About 15 points easier to read. Approximate measure only.

Was this helpful?

Or run it backwards

Type something plain and watch it turn into government-speak, one layer at a time. It is a joke, and it is also the clearest argument for plain language you will see today.